AN INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE
11–12 NOVEMBER 2021
HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
Narrating Cold Wars
The year 2021 marks the 30th anniversary of the end of the “Cold War”, a half-century of superpower rivalry that left few societies untouched. Now, there are concerns about a new great power contest between the United States and China. Our conference will interrogate “Cold War thinking” —
from the primacy it gave to relations between nation-states, to assumptions about zero-sum competition. It will critically examine how these frames are constructed, circulated, mobilised and contested through media and culture. The deadline for proposals is 1 July 2021.
Call for Abstracts
Deadline: 1 July 2021
Conference dates: 11–12 November
We invite proposals for a multidisciplinary conference critically examining “Cold War” thinking, both historically and as a construct for understanding contemporary global rivalries. In particular, we are keen to include papers that critically examine and problematize Cold War narratives; their production and circulation among foreign policy professionals as well as in academia, media, and culture; their broader influence on contemporary ways of thinking; and their continued use in the 21st century. Especially welcome are interdisciplinary papers that draw connections among fields such as international relations, international communications studies, journalism, cinema and television studies, cultural studies, and the visual arts.
The year 2021 marks the 30th anniversary of the end of the Cold War, a half-century of superpower rivalry whose effects were profoundly felt in nearly every part of the world. Hardly anyone had predicted the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the peaceful end of the Cold War. And yet, the celebratory spectacle of 1991 spurred attempts to produce a master-narrative that could make sense of the often bewildering events of the previous decades. The most noted among these was political scientist Francis Fukuyama’s “end of history” thesis, which triumphantly announced the victory of capitalist liberal democracy over competing ideologies, chief among which was communism.
Similarly, academic historians were re-energized to produce a master-narrative that could not only give satisfactory shape, direction, and purpose to the events of the previous decades, but also provide scaffolding to make sense of the vast amount of new evidence, such as freshly released archival materials and published memoirs, which would soon become publicly available. Historiographical debates, which flourished and were fuelled by the events of the Cold War, came full circle as orthodox accounts that had blamed Soviet political and ideological expansionism for the Cold War and its worst excesses started to prevail again over revisionist and New Left efforts to shift the object of blame onto the hegemonic project of United States imperialism and its pre-eminence in global capitalism. The end of history, it seemed, had arrived. And the victors were eager to claim its definitive authorship.
But the political and historical impetus to unify a narrative for the Cold War at its conclusion also triggered divergent new lines of interdisciplinary, theoretically informed, methodologically eclectic, and self-reflexive enquiry, whose modes of analysis range from the technical to the moral and to the aesthetic. A more diverse scholarship surrounding the Cold War has sought to dislodge it from the preoccupations of national security interests, geo-strategic power play, grand ideological conflict, political leadership, political regime typology, and military technology at the heart of more conventional approaches in international relations and historical fields of study, giving more space to questions of psychology, beliefs, sentiments, (popular) culture, the arts, media, communications, new technology, and domestic politics including the politics of race, gender, sexuality, and class. For instance, it is often popular culture, through its non-institutionalized narratives, that inspires reflection on mainstream historical narratives, in which historical moments can be re-thought in entirely new perspectives that notice people, movements, ideas, practices, and events outside and beyond the dominant narrative. This is an acknowledgment of the sheer complexity of the Cold War and the gross inadequacy of linear causal thinking for making sense of it.
Beyond refreshing our understanding of the old US-Soviet Cold War, these multiple lines of scholarship can also help illuminate contemporary rivalries, most obviously between the US and China, but also in numerous regional arenas. This conference seeks to critically examine these and other emerging spaces of enquiry, including but not limited to fields such as international relations, international communications studies, journalism, cinema and television studies, cultural studies, and the visual arts. It will explore how Cold War narratives and their tropes have been constructed, circulated, mobilised, made sense of, and contested, especially through academia, media, and culture. The conference will focus on how these narratives persist in framing elite and popular understandings of the contemporary world.
The topics include, but are not limited to:
Revisiting the “end of history” thesis, 30 years on
Contemporary neoliberalism, authoritarian populism, and social protest as legacies of the Cold War
Superpower rivalry and its impact on small and middle powers: US hegemony; US—China competition; China’s Belt and Road initiative
Chinese perspectives on the technology wars (including 5G), global pandemic, and other contemporary issues
Soft power, smart power, sharp power
(Post) Cold War propaganda: News, documentaries, cinema, television, social media, visual culture
The language of the Cold War: Narrative form, structure, tropes, vocabularies, visuality
Comparative media systems and cultures: Beyond “Four Theories” thinking
The production of Cold War scholarship: Academic and research institutions, the funding of research programmes, academic journals and presses, disciplinary gatekeepers
Cold War sources: Archives, memoirs, espionage and secret intelligence, and their popularisation
Asian (and, in particular, Hong Kong) experiences and perspectives in Cold War scholarship
Third Cinema: Cold War violence, genocide, trauma
Popular culture and the re-imagination of historical events
Cold War technologies and the transformation of everyday life
The space race and other Cold War spectacles of human achievement vs. contemporary decadence, exhaustion, and despair
The nuclear dimension: Arms race, ecological destruction, clean energy, sustainability
Complexity: Future analysis, narrating plausible futures, anticipatory thinking and capabilities, resilience
War games, simulation, virtual reality, robotics, and visual art
Please email proposals to email@example.com by 1 July 2021.
Individual paper proposals must include:
Title of paper
Abstract (300 to 500 words), which should include a clear explanation of how the paper fits the conference theme, its central argument(s), and a summary of its substance
Authors’ names, academic/professional affiliations, 50-100-word bios, and email addresses
We are very keen to receive proposals from graduate students. Travel subsidies are available for selected paper presenters. There will be a “Best Paper” award.
The organising committee includes the editors of Global Media and Communication (Daya Thussu) and Global Storytelling: Journal of Digital and Moving Image (Ying Zhu). Selected presenters will be invited to submit their papers to special sections in these two journals, or to an edited volume for the Routledge book series edited by Thussu, Internationalizing Media Studies or Advances in Internationalizing Media Studies.
Download this call as a PDF file for printing:
This conference is organised by a multidisciplinary group of researchers at Hong Kong Baptist University, including scholars of media and communication, film studies, visual arts, and political science.
Professor Cherian George
Asst Professor Mateja Kovacic
Professor Kenneth Paul Tan
Professor Daya Thussu
Professor Ying Zhu
Professor Jean-Pierre Cabestan
Professor Alistair Cole
Assoc Professor Noit Banai
Administrative support is provided by the Centre for Media and Communication Research, School of Communication.